Abstract
Trauma management is the primary mission of military surgeons. Since the Vietnam War, however, military surgeons have relinquished leadership in clinical trauma care to the civilian sector, particularly to urban university surgeons. In this paper we explore whether the Army's contribution to trauma research has also diminished. Using standard bibliometric analysis of publication counts, we have shown that few recent publications related to trauma have originated from U.S. Army Medical Centers, compared with adjacent civilian universities. In 1988, 16 papers originating from the eight Army Medical Centers had key words related to trauma. In contrast, eight universities adjacent to the Army's medical centers published 139 articles on trauma. Problems including lack of clinical exposure to trauma patients, lack of funding, and inadequate emphasis on staff research training have contributed to this decline. We review these factors and describe solutions that could reverse this trend.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.