Abstract
Objective: To test whether passive leg cycling (PLC) during arm cycling ergometry (ACE) affects peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) differently in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) at/above the 6th thoracic vertebra (T6) and below T6. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study, analyzed by univariate and multivariate regression models. Between- and within-group differences were examined during (a) ACE only, (b) ACE combined with PLC (ACE-PLC), and (c) ACE combined with functional electrical stimulation cycling (FES hybrid). Fifteen SCI subjects were recruited and grouped according to injury level: at/above T6 (SCI-high, n = 8) or below T6 (SCI-low, n = 7). VO2peak tests during ACE only, ACE-PLC, and FES hybrid were performed in random order on separate days. Results: In the SCI-high group, mean (SD) VO2peak was 19% higher during ACE-PLC than during ACE only [21.0 (3.8) vs 17.7 (5.0) mL·kg-1·min-1; p = .002], while VO2peak during FES hybrid cycling was 16% higher than during ACE-PLC [24.4 (4.1) mL·kg-1·min-1; p = .001]. No significant differences among exercise modalities were found for the SCI-low group. Conclusion: Additional training modalities (eg, PLC) during ACE facilitate exercise in SCI-high individuals, but not to the level of the FES hybrid method. Conversely, additional training modalities may not increase training load in SCI-low individuals.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
