Aristotle's Account of Anger: Narcissism and Illusions of Self‐Sufficiency

Abstract

This paper considers an allegation by M. Stocker and E. Hegeman that Aristotle's account of anger yields a narcissistic passion bedevilled by illusions of self‐sufficiency. The paper argues on behalf of Aristotle's valuing of anger within a virtuous and flourishing life, showing that and why Aristotle's account is neither narcissistic nor involves illusions of self‐sufficiency. In so arguing a deeper appreciation of Aristotle's understanding of a self‐sufficient life is reached, as are some interesting contrasts between Aristotle's understanding of anger, its connections to value and our own understanding of these matters.