Abstract

This paper focuses on the disappointing nature of the last few sentences of De Anima II 12, where it is Aristotle’s intention to specify what smell is apart from the immaterial of a scent by the nose. It has been argued that the concluding remarks of the chapter scarcely advance our understanding of sensible knowledge, in so far as they restrict themselves to repeating what is already known: that smelling is something else in addition to the immaterial of a scent. In order to save Aristotle from triviality, this paper explores the main issues surrounding the thesis of the reception of sensible forms without matter (424a18), considering in particular the literal alteration of sense-organs that is supposed to underlie every single episode of perceptive awareness. The paper reaches a somewhat paradoxical conclusion: concentration on literalist physiology tends to reinforce spiritualism, which keeps coming back in the guise of an appeal to basic sensitive powers (99b35) which inanimate bodies lack.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call