Abstract
IT was an altogether unexpected pleasure to find Prof. Spring eager and willing to comment on my recent article.' It was even more gratifying to discover on how many points we agreed.2 As to his criticisms, these may be put under three headings: (i) that I inadequately summarized the nature and argument of his contribution to the debate of the I950s; (2) that the main point of difference between us concerns the extent to which there was or was not a fundamental change in the aristocracy's financial position in the mid-Victorian period; and (3) that I have overstated the importance of his own contribution to the developing historiography of nineteenth-century English landed society. Let me deal with each of these points in turn.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.