Abstract
This paper presents a new argument defending the long debated literary autonomy of Claudius Claudianus’ first invective In Rufinum . In this work, the poet fromAlexandria reversed the declamatory argument that Juvenal had deployed in his Satire XIII in order to reinforce the unity between the vignettes in his invective. Some features of Juvenal’s reception in the Roman intellectualmilieu of the 4th century enable to understand this archetypal reference Claudian makes to the satires. This hypothesis is supported by comparing the mentioned allusion with similar uses of such secondary argumentative threads in a non-invective poem of Claudian, the Panegyricus dictus Mallio Theodoro consuli . This non-satirical imitation of Juvenal by Claudianus, not explored so far, gives nuances to the mood in which the poet combines dynamically the genres placing himself in the Greek and Roman literary tradition.
Highlights
This paper presents a new argument defending the long debated literary autonomy of Claudius Claudianus’ first invective In Rufinum
WITKE, C. (1970), Latin Satire: the Structure of Persuasion, Leiden, Brill
Summary
Las invectivas que Claudiano compuso contra Rufino y Eutropio, regentes de facto en la corte de Constantinopla durante los años 396-399, han suscitado una atención particular en el debate sobre la naturaleza de los géneros literarios que el alejandrino combina en el conjunto de su poesía política. Los poemas contra Rufino, transmitidos en dos libros por la tradición manuscrita, añaden dos puntos de discusión específicos. En este trabajo defenderé la autonomía literaria del primer libro del In Rufinum (Ruf.1), basándome en que Claudiano dio cohesión a las diferentes secciones de su poema invirtiendo un argumento declamatorio tradicional, tomado deliberadamente de la sátira 13 de Juvenal. Este análisis aportará a su vez algunas precisiones acerca del modo en que Claudiano amalgama los géneros literarios, concretamente cómo convierte su invectiva contra Rufino en un encomio anti-satírico de Honorio y Estilicón. Antes de desarrollar esta hipótesis, resulta pertinente recordar qué puntos esenciales han centrado la discusión sobre la unidad poética de los dos libros In Rufinum
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.