Abstract
This paper points out some problems with two recent logical systems --- one due to Prakken and Sartor, the other due to Kowalski and Toni --- designedfor the representation of defeasible arguments in general, but with a specialemphasis on legal reasoning.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
