Abstract
This article considers Patricia Owens' Between War and Politics in the light of its important critique of political moralism. For Owens, following Arendt, the instrumental use of violence in the political domain is dangerous if it serves abstract ends. The moral ’wars’ of neo-conservatism and humanitarian interventionism embody this danger. I argue that this conflation of neo-conservative foreign policy and progressive liberalism is misguided, it underestimates the latter's increasing mediations between norm, legality and power. A critique of present moralization of politics should emphasize codification of rights to delimit the procedural framework within which international intervention can be made legitimate.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
