Abstract
Background: α–Agonists and endothelins (ETs) are the only agents that have been proved to induce significant contraction of the prostate. Although the response to phenylephrine (PE) is dependent on the quality of smooth muscle (SM) within the prostate, it is not clear whether the response to ET–1 is also influenced by SM density. We evaluate the relationship between contractile responsiveness to ET–1 and the area density of SM of the human prostate.Materials and Methods: Specimens were obtained from 17 patients with prostatic hyperplasia that underwent transurethral resection of the prostate. Specimens were used for isometric tension study (PE, KCl and ET) and also for quantitative morphometric analysis.Results: PE and ET–1 induced dose–dependent contractile responses. There were no significant differences in the average maximum response (E<sub>max</sub>) to these two agents. E<sub>max</sub> to KCl and PE showed direct positive correlations with the area density of SM. E<sub>max</sub> to ET–1 also showed a positive correlation with the SM density, although this relationship was weaker than those for the other two agents. Moreover, there was a strong positive relationship between E<sub>max</sub> to PE, KCl and that to ET–1.Conclusions: The area density of SM appeared to significantly influence the contractile response to ET–1 as well as the response to PE and KCl.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
