Abstract

Humanity will soon define a new era for nature-one that seeks to transform decades of underwhelming responses to the global biodiversity crisis. Area-based conservation efforts, which include both protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, are likely to extend and diversify. However, persistent shortfalls in ecological representation and management effectiveness diminish the potential role of area-based conservation in stemming biodiversity loss. Here we show how the expansion of protected areas by national governments since 2010 has had limited success in increasing the coverage across different elements of biodiversity (ecoregions, 12,056threatened species, 'Key Biodiversity Areas' and wilderness areas) and ecosystem services (productive fisheries, and carbon services on land and sea). To be more successful after 2020, area-based conservation must contribute more effectively to meeting global biodiversity goals-ranging from preventing extinctions to retaining the most-intact ecosystems-and must better collaborate with the many Indigenous peoples, community groups and private initiatives that are central to the successful conservation of biodiversity. The long-term success of area-based conservation requires parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity to secure adequate financing, plan for climate change and make biodiversity conservation a far stronger part of land, water and sea management policies.

Highlights

  • Between 2010 and 2019, protected areas expanded from covering 14.1% to 15.3% of global land and freshwater environments and from 2.9% to 7.5% of the marine realm[7] (Figs. 1, 2)

  • The feature that distinguishes between a protected area and an OECM is that the former has a primary conservation objective whereas the latter delivers the effective in situ conservation of biodiversity, regardless of its objectives

  • We provide an up-to-date temporal analysis of how the recent expansion of protected areas globally has affected the net coverage of the qualitative components of Aichi Target 11; details of methodology and calculations are provided in the Supplementary Methods

Read more

Summary

Check for updates

The current ten-year Strategic Plan for Biodiversity[6] of the CBD—which was agreed to by 168 countries in 2010—has an explicit target (Aichi Target 11) that stipulates ‘at least 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water areas and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem services, are conserved through effectively and equitably managed, ecologically representative and well-connected systems of protected areas and OECMs, and integrated into the wider landscape and seascape’ by 2020 This target has dominated the area-based conservation agenda for the past decade. Section, as a database showing the global extent of these sites is not yet available

Protected areas being ecologically representative
Coverage of ecosystem services
Malaysia Mongolia
Soil carbon Terrestrial KBAs Biomass carbon
What is measured
Lessons learned and priority actions
To be equitably managed
Making OECMs count
Immediate discrete priorities
Secure adequate financing
Make biodiversity conservation mainstream
Conclusions
Findings
Code availability

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.