Are you an empiricist or a believer? Neural signatures of predictive strategies in humans.

Abstract

Predictive coding theory suggests that prior knowledge assists human behavior, from simple perceptual formation to complex decision-making processes. Here, we manipulate prior knowledge by inducing uninformative vs. informative (low and high) target probability expectation in a perceptual decision-making task while simultaneously recording EEG. We found that priors did not impact sensitivity (d') but did shape response criterion (c), being more liberal for high expected trials and more conservative for low expected trials. Importantly, we mapped the neural signature of this criterion shift, with liberal and conservative trials characterized by low and high posterior alpha amplitude, respectively. Moreover, we demonstrated that inter-areas communication along the fronto-parietal-occipital pathway is linked to the strategic tuning of sensory areas. Specifically, whereas parieto-occipital alpha synchronization facilitates the exploitation of expectancy-type information by shaping pre-stimulus alpha amplitude in a prior-dependent fashion, fronto-parietal theta coupling mediates a supervisory process on the predictive machinery, attenuating the impact of prior on sensory processing. These findings aided us in tracing the neurofunctional mechanisms underlying the differences in predictive styles existing in the general population. Crucially, an imbalance between alpha and theta synchronization leads to interindividual differences favoring priors overweighting (believers) vs. prioritization of sensory input (empiricist) strategy, respectively.