Abstract

The forward-sprint is considered to be, and is regularly performed as, a unique measure of “on-ground” linear-speed performance. Thus far, no investigation has simultaneously studied different forms of linear-speed or investigated whether different forms of linear-speed should be observed as unique performance quality. The purpose of this study was to determine (I) the achievements (i.e. execution time), and (II) the reliability and inter-relationships between various linear-speed performances. The participants were 42 male physical education students with substantial sport-specific backgrounds. We applied a total of six tests: three quadrupedal (supine backward, supine forward, and pronate backward locomotion) and three bipedal-performances (forward sprinting, backward sprinting, lateral shuffling). All of the tests showed appropriate reliability parameters (Cronbach Alpha ranged from 0.91 to 0.97; Inter-Item-R 0.78–0.92; Coefficient-of-Variation 1.3–9.1). The tests used in this study shared between 9% and 50% of the common variance. Our results suggest that different activities require activity-specific tests of linear-speed. This is particularly significant in those sports and activities in which quadrupedal locomotion patterns are highly important (wrestling, physically trained military services, law enforcement, fire and rescue, protective services).

Highlights

  • In sport science and practice, linear speed is regularly defined as maximal forward running of a specific straight line distance (Salonikidis and Zafeiridis, 2008; Green et al, 2011)

  • The within-subject variations (CVs) in the speed tests ranged between 1.3% and 9.1%, with the lowest variability for the S30 test

  • The lowest reliability was evidenced for the RCRAB (6.5%, 0.91, and 0.78; for coefficient of variation (CV), CA and inter-item correlation coefficients (IIR), respectively)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In sport science and practice, linear speed is regularly defined as maximal forward running of a specific straight line distance (Salonikidis and Zafeiridis, 2008; Green et al, 2011). The relationships between different sprint distances (from 10 to 40 m of straight-line-sprint from a static start) were rarely below r=0.78, and reached up to r=0.90 (Harris et al, 2008; Young et al, 2008; Salaj and Markovic, 2011) It seems that those tests assess similar qualities. The same should be observed for quadrupedal locomotions, such as crawling, creeping, etc.,

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call