Are Tourniquets Indicated in Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Era of Tranexamic Acid: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Abstract

IntroductionThere is conflicting evidence in the literature regarding the clinical utility of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), specifically in regards to perioperative blood loss. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we aim to evaluate the clinical advantages and disadvantages associated with tourniquet use in the setting of TKA. MethodsA systematic review was conducted through April 2017using keywords: “tourniquet” and “total knee arthroplasty” or “total knee replacement”. Perioperative variables including TXA use, blood loss, incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and wound complications were either extracted from the studies or corresponding authors were contacted. A sub-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of TXA on intraoperative and total blood loss (TBL), and VTE incidence. ResultsAfter review of 558 articles, 19 studies reporting outcomes in 1094 patients were analyzed. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the tourniquet cohorts compared to non-tourniquet (p<0.01). TBL was reduced in tourniquet groups but not significantly (p=0.08). In contrast, calculated blood loss was greater in tourniquet groups, but this difference was not significant (p=0.43). There was a greater likelihood for wound complications and VTE among tourniquet assisted TKA, albeit only significant for the former (p=0.01). TXA sub-analysis demonstrated intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced with tourniquet use regardless of TXA implementation (p<0.01). In studies without TXA, tourniquet patients were at greater risk of developing VTE (p=0.08). These risks decreased with TXA administration. ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that tourniquets prevent intraoperative blood loss, yet within the postoperative period, there is no significant difference in TBL between tourniquet and non-tourniquet assisted TKA. Level of EvidenceLevel II; Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis