Are there biases in biopsy sampling? Potential drivers of sex ratio in projectile biopsy samples from two small delphinids

Abstract

AbstractMolecular assays were used to determine the sex of 1,294 biopsied common dolphins (658 long‐beaked common dolphins,Delphinus capensis, and 636 short‐beaked common dolphins,D. delphis) in the Southern California Bight. Sex ratio differed substantially between the two species; females comprised 241 (36.6%) ofD. capensissamples and 410 (64.5%) ofD. delphissamples. All biopsies were taken either from a large research ship or from a small, rigid‐hull inflatable boat (RHIB) launched from the larger ship. When conducting replicate biopsy effort on the same schools from each vessel/platform (“Tandem Biopsy Sampling”), we found evidence that disproportionately more femaleD. capensiswere biopsied from theRHIBthan from the ship but the same was not true forD. delphis. We suspect that these results are driven by bowriding‐behavior differences between the two species. Biopsy duration, geographic location, school size, and Julian date were considered as potential covariates with sex ratio; geographic location was the only one to show strong evidence of correlation. This study also presents an alternative to the erroneous practice of comparing sex ratios to a theoretical assumption of parity (i.e., 50:50 sex ratio) when researchers avoid sampling animals paired with calves.