Abstract

PurposeThe study aim was to analyse the relationships between the results of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the Functional Reach Test (FRT), and the temporal and spatial gait parameters determined with the GAITRite system.MethodsThe study included 60 healthy, physically active elderly people aged 70.4 ± 5.1 years. The participants’ functional fitness was evaluated with the TUG and FRT, and their temporal and spatial gait parameters – with the GAITRite system.ResultsThe TUG results correlated inversely with the step length (<i>r</i> = –0.70 and <i>r</i> = –0.61 for the preferred and fast speed, respectively), stride length (<i>r</i> = –0.71 and <i>r</i> = –0.61, respectively), and velocity (<i>r</i> = –0.69 and <i>r</i> = –0.38, respectively). The regression model with these variables explained 43% of variance in the TUG results (p &#8804 0.0001). The FRT results correlated positively with the step length (<i>r</i> = 0.61 and <i>r</i> = 0.54, for the preferred and fast speed, respectively), stride length (<i>r</i> = 0.60 and <i>r</i> = 0.56, respectively), and velocity (<i>r</i> = 0.37 and r = 0.38). The regression model with these variables explained 26% of variance in the FRT outcomes.ConclusionsBasic temporal and spatial parameters of gait at the preferred speed, i.e. velocity, step length, stance time, single support time, swing time, and double support time, explain up to 43% of the TUG outcome variance and 26% of the FRT results variance.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.