Are shared models always cultural models? A study of the cultural model of affect and emotion in Chuuk

Abstract

This article investigates a theoretical tension in cultural models theory between their sharedness and their origin in social and culturally mediated experiences. To address this tension empirically, this article presents a mixed-methods analysis of the shared understanding of a typology of emotion in Chuuk Lagoon. Based on a review of contemporary theory, one would expect that while people in Chuuk would have distinct cultural models for specific culturally meaningful paradigmatic emotions, the shared model for the entire typology of emotion would be structured by two universal dimensions of core affect (arousal and hedonic quality). But this theoretical literature ignores the importance of an intersubjective dimension of prereflective experience. This dimension may be culturally muted in industrial, educated, and rich contexts where most prior research has been conducted but culturally emphasized in places like Chuuk. The mixed-methods analysis finds that an intersubjective dimension along with a hedonic quality dimension structures the shared model of a typology for affect and emotion in Chuuk, while the arousal dimension found elsewhere is muted. Thus, shared models of affect and emotion are cultural models both in terms of specific, culturally elaborated emotions and in terms of the cultural emphasis given to underlying affective and intersubjective dimensions.