Abstract
The inability of classic NPV analysis to capture the future value of options in a capital budgeting analysis is now well documented by Trigeorgis (1993, 2005), Copeland and Antikarov (2001), and others. In spite of this, traditional NPV analysis continues to be described as a normative approach. The author surveys Fortune 1,000 companies to see if they have picked up on the use of real options to complement traditional analysis. Out of 279 respondents, 40 were currently using real options (14.3%). While the percentage is small, the number is higher than in previous studies. The author goes on to describe in what manner real options are being used and, of equal importance, why they are resisted by many. Somewhat encouraging is the intent of well over half the nonusers to consider the use of real options in the future.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
