Abstract

Screening for fecal contamination via microbial water quality monitoring is a critical component of safe drinking water provision and public health protection. Achieving adequate levels of microbial water quality testing, however, is a challenge in resource-limited settings. One strategy for addressing this challenge is to improve the efficiency of monitoring programs. In African countries, quantitative microbial testing methods are commonly used to monitor chlorinated piped water systems. However, presence/absence (P/A) tests may provide an appropriate alternative for water supplies that generally show negative fecal contamination results. This study compares 1048 water quality test results for samples collected from five African urban water systems. The operators of the systems conducted parallel tests on the 1048 samples using their standard quantitative methods (e.g., most probable number or membrane filtration) and the Colitag™ method in P/A format. Combined data demonstrates agreement rates of 97.9% (1024/1046) for detecting total coliforms and 97.8% (1025/1048) for detecting E. coli. We conclude that the P/A test offers advantages as a simpler and similarly sensitive measure of potential fecal contamination for large, urban chlorinated water systems. P/A tests may also offer a cost-effective alternative to quantitative methods, as they are quicker to perform and require less laboratory equipment.

Highlights

  • The ingestion of fecal pathogens transmitted by contaminated water, food, and hands are the primary bases of diarrhea, a leading cause of sickness and death among children under the age of five [1,2,3,4]

  • The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality (4th edition) state that P/A methods are appropriate for monitoring chlorinated water supply systems when the majority of tests for fecal indicator organisms provide negative results [9]

  • 27,000 test results from piped water systems across Africa showed that fecal indicator bacteria were only detected in 4% of samples from water piped to plots and 2% of samples from water piped to public taps and standpipes [25]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ingestion of fecal pathogens transmitted by contaminated water, food, and hands are the primary bases of diarrhea, a leading cause of sickness and death among children under the age of five [1,2,3,4]. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality (4th edition) state that P/A methods are appropriate for monitoring chlorinated water supply systems when the majority of tests for fecal indicator organisms provide negative results [9]. 27,000 test results from piped water systems across Africa showed that fecal indicator bacteria were only detected in 4% of samples from water piped to plots and 2% of samples from water piped to public taps and standpipes [25] Based on these findings, we hypothesized that P/A methods are appropriate alternatives to quantitative microbial water quality assays for chlorinated piped water supplies in Africa. African cities: Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire; Nairobi, Kenya; Bamako, Mali; and Dakar, Senegal

Materials and Methods
Sample Collection
Microbial Testing Methods
Quantitative Method
Quality Control
Data Analysis
Results and Discussion
Method
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.