Are plain radiographic measurements still consistent with a diagnosis of basilar invagination in the era of cross-sectional images?

Abstract

Retrospective cross-sectional study To evaluate the validity and obtain optimal cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements for the diagnosis of basilar invagination (BI). Two hundred seventy-six patients (46 patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion for BI and 230 patients who were treated for minor cervical trauma) seen in a single institution from January 2010 to December 2016 were included in this study. Age, sex, and body mass index were adjusted for the patients. The Ranawat index (RI), modified Ranawat method (MRM), and Redlund-Johnell method (RJM) were used to diagnose BI on plain radiographs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and diagnostic odds ratio of 3 radiologic measurements were compared. We also calculated the optimized cutoff values of 3 radiologic measurements using the receiver operating characteristic curve in our patients. The mean age of the 130 women and 146 men was 58.3 ± 14.5 years. The mean values of RI, MRM, and RJM in the BI group were 12.5 ± 3.3, 23.1 ± 3.8, and 27.3 ± 3.6 in women and 13.6 ± 2.6, 26.8 ± 4.2, and 34.7 ± 5.1 in men. There was a significant difference between the sexes (P < .05). The accuracies of RI, MRM, and RJM were 95%, 89.6%, and 92.3% in women and 93%, 68.2%, and 85.4% in men, respectively. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 38 mm in men. Three radiologic measurements (RI, MRM, and RJM) are reliable for the diagnosis of BI even in the era of cross-sectional images. The validity of these measurements depends on sex and particular radiologic measurement. The optimized cutoff values of RI, MRM, and RJM were 14, 26, and 32 mm in women and 15, 29, and 37 mm in men. These cutoff values showed high validity when compared to the CT and MRI findings.