Are PHOMS (Peri papillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures ) with an elevated optic disc still a diagnosis dilemma?

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify clinical characteristics that would help make or rule out the diagnosis of Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients referred for papilledema (PE) with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) DesignA retrospective cohort study SubjectsAll patient referred for PE excluding PE with Frisén grade ≥ 3, optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, compressive optic neuropathy. Patients were divided into 2 groups:Group1= isolated PHOMSGroup2= PHOMS associated with IIH MethodsWe analyzed the location of PHOMS based on OCT-EDI and calculated their volume Main outcome MeasuresP RNFL,GCC, PHOMS’ volume Results154 patients (308 eyes) were included, mean age was 29 with female predominance (78%). PHOMS were associated to these etiologies : IIH(38.3%) isolated (35.7%), posterior uveitis (11%),optic disc drusen (ODD)(10%), and tilted optic disc (5%). An MRI was obtained in 83.1% of cases. More than half of the MRIs were interpreted as consistent with IIH. However, only 39.7% of these patients had confirmed IIH with 44.5% of sensitivity and 55.5% of sensibility. PHOMS were overrepresented in the nasal region (95.5%).The location of PHOMS in the superior and/ or inferior quadrant was significantly associated to IIH or optic dusc drusen, while their presence in the temporal or nasal sector was strongly associated to isolated lesions. PHOMS mean and median volume were 1.66 μm3 and 1.50 μm3 respectively. There was a significant difference in PHOMS volume with higher volume in IIH patients (p=0.0037). Follow up of these patients at 3 and 6 months demonstrated no significant changes in visual function, as per visual field mean deviation, and visual acuity measurements as well as Ganglion cell layer (GCL).Mean pRNFL, showed a decrease of -4.225 μm at 3 months and of –6.489 μm at 6 months, when compared to initial measurement independing of the etiology. ConclusionIsolated PHOMS should be considered as a distinct entity. In asymptomatic patients, PHOMS should be carefully studied. Nasal or temporal location, small volume, stable aspect over the course of weeks or months, are so suggestive of this entity. This strategy would considerably reduce the impact on patients’ anxiety and morbidity.