Abstract

This study uses the data from many of the mandatory fields in ClinicalTrials.gov to examine changes, possibly leading to more complexity in the design and execution of commercially sponsored phase 3 clinical trials. In this analysis we compare baseline year 2008 data, when a broad number of the protocol/study design and execution variables became mandatory, with the data from the last full year of results, 2013. There has been relatively little change in the protocol and study design over the years covered in this study. The most pronounced change is associated with single-patient duration: there is a significant increase in the period of time a patient is treated in the study protocol. The study also highlights an important methodological issue: many of the claims in print about complexity have yet been substantiated through the use of peer-reviewed data or in settings where others can interrogate the results. In general, there is limited evidence for significant increases in the study and protocol design and execution of phase 3 clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.