Are palatal rugae reliable markers for 3D superimposition and forensic human identification after palatal expansion? A systematic review

Abstract

ObjectivesPalatal rugae are periodic structures situated in the palatal mucosa, often used as landmarks for human identification and superimposition of digital dental models. This review aims to collect the current evidence regarding whether orthodontic palatal expansion could affect the stability of the palatal rugae and to give preliminary guidelines. Materials and methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed in the scientific databases Pubmed; Embase; WoS; and Cochrane. Grey Literature was also sought (clinicaltrial.gov; ICTRP; AHRQ; INAHTA). The search protocol, was registered in PROSPERO (N*208722). Data extraction comprised: year of publication, journal, sample size, characteristics of the experimental and control group, type of expander, expansion protocol, rugae classification, measurement method on casts, time between casts, method error, rugae change, morphology change and overall outcome. Risk of bias of the included articles was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. ResultsA total of 12394 manuscripts were retrieved after duplicate removal. From these, nine articles were finally included for data extraction. three studies scored as low risk of bias, two as medium and four as high. ConclusionsThe morphology of the palatal rugae can be modified by palatal expansion techniques, especially by rapid maxillary expansion. The first rugae is the most stable along with the points close to the palatal midline, which should be used as a reference both for manual or semi-automatic superimpositions. Human identification and serial superimpositions based on palatal rugae should not be carried immediately post expansion and be taken in consideration with caution in patients who underwent prior palatal expansion.