Are Obstetricians And Gynaecologists In Singapore In Favor Of Stem Cell Research And Cloning?: A Survey Of Their Views

Abstract

Aim: To study the views of obstetricians and gynaecologists in Singapore on stem cell research and cloning. Method: A postal survey of local practising obstetrics & gynaecology (O&G) specialists conducted in December 2001. Results: A total 62 (28.6%) of the 217 O&G specialists surveyed, responded within 3 weeks from the time of posting. The majority was in favour of animal cloning (71.0%), adult stem cell research (88.7%) and embryonal germ stem cell research (from aborted fetuses) (67.7%). Opinions were about equally divided with regards to embryonic stem cell research (early embryo <14 days) (46.8% in favour) and therapeutic cloning (50.0% in favour). Only a minority was in favour of reproductive cloning (8.1%). Specialists who had conscientious objection to participate in treatment to terminate pregnancy under Termination of Pregnancy Act of Singapore, were more conservative as were female O&G specialists. Though more liberal in their views on most aspects, senior specialists were inclined to be conservative on reproductive cloning. Regression analysis showed with statistical significance, that the specialists who were not conscientious objectors were more supportive on therapeutic cloning, and embryonic stem cell research. Conscientious objector status was more influential than sex or seniority status in determining the view on therapeutic cloning and embryonic stem cell research. Conclusion: There was a diversity of views among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Singapore. There was strong support for animal cloning and adult stem cell research but support for embryonic stem cell research and therapeutic cloning was equivocal. The majority was against reproductive cloning.