Abstract
Contrary to Baker and Wurgler (2002), we find that the importance of historical average market-to-book in leverage regressions is not due to past equity market timing. We find that only equity issues may be timed to conditions in equity market, but they do not have significant long-lasting effects on capital structure. Other transactions exhibit timing patterns that are unlikely to induce a negative relation between market-to-book and leverage. We also find that historical average market-to-book has a significant effect on current financing and investment decisions, implying that it contains information about growth opportunities not captured by current market-to-book.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
