Abstract

Inhibitory control, the inhibition of prepotent actions, is essential for higher-order cognitive processes such as planning, reasoning, and self-regulation. Individuals and species differ in inhibitory control. Identifying what influences inhibitory control ability within and between species is key to understanding how it evolved. We compared performance in the cylinder task across five lizard species: tree skinks (Egernia striolata), gidgee skinks (Egernia stokesii), eastern blue-tongue skinks (Tiliqua s. scincoides), sleepy lizards (Tiliqua r. asper), and eastern water skinks (Eulamprus quoyii). In our task, animals had to inhibit the prepotent motor response of directly approaching a reward placed within a semi-transparent mesh cylinder and instead reach in through the side openings. Additionally, in three lizard species, we compared performance in the cylinder task to reversal learning to determine the task specificity of inhibitory ability. Within species, neither sex, origin, body condition, neophobia, nor pre-experience with other cognitive tests affected individual performance. Species differed in motor response inhibition: Blue-tongue skinks made fewer contacts with the semi-transparent cylinder wall than all other species. Blue-tongue skinks also had lower body condition than the other species which suggest motivation as the underlying cause for species differences in task performance. Moreover, we found no correlation between inhibitory ability across different experiments. This is the first study comparing cylinder task performance among lizard species. Given that inhibitory control is probably widespread in lizards, motor response inhibition as exercised in the cylinder task appears to have a long evolutionary history and is likely fundamental to survival and fitness.SignificanceThe study of lizard cognition is receiving increasing attention. Lizards are a diverse group with a wide range of ecological attributes and represent a model system through which we can test a wide range of hypotheses relating to cognitive evolution. Furthermore, considering their evolutionary history, studying non-avian reptile cognition can help understand the evolution of different cognitive abilities including inhibitory control. Here, we provide a comparison of inhibitory control ability in five lizard species. Consequently, we are able to, firstly, validate a method (the cylinder task) initially developed for the use in mammals and birds, for use in lizards, and secondly, collect valuable data on inhibitory control in a poorly studied group with respect to cognitive ability. Our study suggests non-cognitive factors as a major influence on cylinder task performance, which is in agreement with previous studies of other vertebrates.

Highlights

  • To maximize gain in a given situation, animals often need to exercise inhibitory control over their behavior (Diamond 2013)

  • Performance in the opaque cylinder phase significantly correlated with body condition in bluetongue skinks only (GLMM, body condition = 0.078, 95% CIlow = 0.012, 95% CIup = 0.140, p = 0.007; Online Resource Table S5), showing that individuals in better condition performed better

  • In the semi-transparent cylinder phase, neither sex, body condition, pre-experience, nor individual learning rate shown in the opaque cylinder phase significantly predicted detour performance (GLMM, p > 0.05; Online Resource Table S6)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To maximize gain in a given situation, animals often need to exercise inhibitory control over their behavior (Diamond 2013). Thereafter, the opaque cylinder is replaced with a transparent cylinder to test motor response inhibition by quantifying successful detours when a reward is visible (e.g., Boogert et al 2011; Bray et al 2014; MacLean et al 2014; Anderson et al 2016; Kabadayi et al 2016, 2017b; Vernouillet et al 2016, 2018; Lucon-Xiccato et al 2017; Bobrowicz and Osvath 2018; Isaksson et al 2018; Szabo et al 2019b)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call