Are learning objectives useful in evaluating medical school course and instructor performance?

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that learning objectives could be used to evaluate course and instructor effectiveness. Ninety-seven third-year medical students who had their surgical clerkship or their medical clerkship as their first clinical rotation were compared. The surgery clerks received 171 urologic learning objectives. Students taking the surgical clerkship had significantly higher postclerkship recognition of the learning objectives than did medical clerkship students. One year later, these students were again surveyed to determine whether they still knew the correct response to the learning objective. The follow-up survey showed that 50% of the students recognized objectives covered in five of the eight urology lectures, while the other lectures were not effective. Students who recognized the objective on the postclerkship evaluation were more likely to think the objective had been taught on this follow-up survey. These data suggest that learning objectives are useful for evaluating course and instructor effectiveness.