Abstract
There is a growing literature in which it is claimed that conventional wisdom, according to which “identical quantum particles” are to be regarded either as objects violating Leibniz’s principle or – preferably from a physical point of view – not as objects at all but rather as field quanta, is incorrect. The claim is that a collection of identical quantum particles is very much like a collection of classical objects in a situation that is perfectly symmetrical (like Black’s spheres). Such classical objects do not possess individual physical properties that distinguish them, but nevertheless obey a version of Leibniz’s principle because of the irreflexive relations that hold between them; they are weakly discernible. In this paper I criticize this analogy. After explaining the notion of weak discernibility I argue that the availability of this notion does not change the interpretational status quo in quantum mechanics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.