Are Heteroptera communities able to be bioindicators of urban environments?

I O Fedyay,O M Kunakh

doi:10.15421/012025

Abstract

The Heteroptera is a group of animals associated with the vegetation cover. The conducted analysis indicates that groups of heteropterans in the urban environment have a pattern of reaction to the environmental factors, determined using the phytoindication method. In the study, we considered the following hypotheses: 1) phytoindicational assessments of ecological factors may explain the patterns of variation of the groups of heteropterans; 2) among Heteroptera species, comparatively homogenous ecological groups could be distinguished which are characterized by similar character of response to the effect of certain environmental factors; 3) these groups could be used for bioindication of the conditions of environment in urban ecosystems. Stationary collection of heteropterans was performed during three years from May to October of 2017–2019 on six plots in Kharkiv. The article describes factors which affect the structure of groups of Heteroptera within the ecosystem of the large city and assess the bioindication possibilities. The data presented in the article, as well as the conclusions drawn, are to a large extent associated with stenotopic species, most of which could be used as bioindicators of the condition of one or another biocenosis. According to the results of a taxonomical survey in the territory of Kharkiv, 180 species of Heteroptera were found, belonging to 120 genera and 17 families. The highest species diversity was seen for the family Miridae, accounting for 50 species (27.0% of the total number of counted species). Fewer species were identified as the representatives of families Lygaeidae – 46 species (24.9%) and Pentatomidae – 23 (12.4%). Family Rhopalidae was represented by 11 species (5.9%). Nabidae and Tingidae – 10 species each (5.4%). Families Coreidae – 8 (4.3%), Cydnidae and Scutelleridae – 4 species each (2.2%), Anthocoridae – 3 (1.6%). The families Berytidae, Piesmatidae, Pyrrhocoridae and Reduviidae were represented by only 2 species each (1.1%). Families Acanthosomatidae, Alydidae and Aradidae were represented by 1 species each, in total accounting for 1.5%. The reasonably high level of species and ecological diversities of Heteroptera in the territory of the city allows them to be used in bioindication studies. We determined comparatively homogenous ecological groups of heteropterans which have a similar pattern of response to the impact of certain environmental factors. The study demonstrates that phytoindicatory assessments of the ecological factors can explain the patterns of variation in groups of heteropterans, We determined the factors which have effects on the structure of the group of heteropterans within the metropolitan ecosystem. The level of their effect on groups of heteropterans within the city is different. The most influential were light and humidity. Comparison of potential and realized projections of ecological space allows us, to a certain extent, to generate hypotheses about the orientations of transformation of the group heteropterans.

Highlights

There is a paradox of the double way of looking at communities (Matějka, 1992; Zhirkov, 2017)
The Acanthosomatidae, Alydidae and Aradidae families were represented by 1 species each, in total accounting for 1.5%
The elements of morphology of such structures are ecomorphs. Such approach deals with ecomorphs as universal elements of the structure of ecosystems of particular level of organization, which are general both for plant and animal components of the ecosystem. This allowed us to apply the ecological classification of plants for ecological classification of species of heteropterans according to their coordinated dynamics in the group

Summary

Introduction

There is a paradox of the double way of looking at communities (Matějka, 1992; Zhirkov, 2017). The nature of the community is discussed from the opposite points of view: holistic or meristic. According to the holistic paradigm (organisms or structuralism), the biotic component of an ecosystem is a kind of superorganism. The meristic paradigm (or continualism) assumes that various species have a relatively high degree of freedom (Panikov, 2010). Within the framework of continualism, the organism's response to environmental factors is considered as a specific property, which is generally explained by a bell-shaped curve (Mölder et al, 2008; Chytry et al, 2018). The conclusion about living organisms as indicators of environmental properties is logical and became the basis for creating a set of indicator scales. In turn, is a combination of biotope and biocoenosis

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion