Are Governments Matching Citizens’ Demand for Better Lives? A New Approach Comparing Subjective and Objective Welfare Measures

Abstract

We propose a new approach which helps to shed light on the importance of the relationship between a government's outcome and its citizens' desired well-being, defining a concept of welfare gap. To determine this gap, we build two composite indices of well-being measured at the individual and aggregate level - i.e. subjective and objective measures - assessing overall well-being and its progress over time. To this end, we apply idiosyncratic settings of Structural Equation Models to examine the interrelations and causal relationships across determinants and among the underlying drivers of well-being. By comparing the dimensions' weights and rankings of the objective and subjective measures, we obtain largely opposite results in both analyses, except for the relevance of the health status. Material living conditions are the most important dimensions in the objective ranking, whilst the quality of life indicators lie at the top of the subjective ladder. Moreover, the distance between subjective aspirations and objective outcomes described through the welfare gap measure could contribute to explaining the anti-establishment sentiment recently observed in different societies.