Abstract

Annoyance due to environmental odour exposure is in many jurisdictions evaluated by a yes/no decision. Such a binary decision has been typically achieved via odour impact criteria (OIC) and, when applicable, the resultant separation distances between emission sources and residential areas. If the receptors lie inside the required separation distance, odour exposure is characterised with the potential of causing excessive annoyance. The state-of-the-art methodology to determine separation distances is based on two general steps: (i) calculation of the odour exposure (time series of ambient odour concentrations) using dispersion models and (ii) determination of separation distances through the evaluation of this odour exposure by OIC. Regarding meteorological input data, dispersion models need standard meteorological observations and/or atmospheric stability typically on an hourly basis, which requires expertise in this field. In the planning phase, and as a screening tool, an educated guess of the necessary separation distances to avoid annoyance is in some cases sufficient. Therefore, empirical equations (EQs) are in use to substitute the more time-consuming and costly application of dispersion models. Because the separation distance shape often resembles the wind distribution of a site, wind data should be included in such approaches. Otherwise, the resultant separation distance shape is simply given by a circle around the emission source. Here, an outline of selected empirical equations is given, and it is shown that only a few of them properly reflect the meteorological situation of a site. Furthermore, for three case studies, separation distances as calculated from empirical equations were compared against those from Gaussian plume and Lagrangian particle dispersion models. Overall, our results suggest that some empirical equations reach their limitation in the sense that they are not successful in capturing the inherent complexity of dispersion models. However, empirical equations, developed for Germany and Austria, have the potential to deliver reasonable results, especially if used within the conditions for which they were designed. The main advantage of empirical equations lies in the simplification of the meteorological input data and their use in a fast and straightforward approach.

Highlights

  • Odours from industrial, municipal, and agricultural activities are the most common causes of public complaints to authorities, besides noise

  • Dispersion models are typically inputted with annual hourly time series this work, empirical were selected for investigation on the basis that, each in a of, forInexample, wind directionequations and velocity, atmospheric stability and mixing height

  • A meteorological different and unique manner, they greatly simplify the process of determining the directiondependent influence of meteorological data on calculated separation distances when compared to dispersion modelling

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Odours from industrial, municipal, and agricultural activities are the most common causes of public complaints to authorities, besides noise. Governments around the world have set jurisdictional limit values for environmental odours, called odour impact criteria (OIC), to orientate compliance demonstration procedures By this means, separation distances can be calculated on a case-by-case basis and in a direction-dependent manner. Odour-related separation distances do not apply to all kinds of sources This approach is more appropriate for ground-level or low-height sources. Little work has been done comparing the performance of EQs that include meteorology as a predictor with each other and dispersion modelling calculations. This has been done to demonstrate the advantages and shortcomings of such parsimonious methods

Selected Empirical Equations to Assess the Separation Distance
Separation distances calculated using the German
Case Studies
Comparison of the Separation Distance Calculated by Dispersion Models and EQs
Discussion
Findings
Schematic
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call