Are dioxetanes chemiluminescent intermediates in lipoperoxidation?

Abstract

Ultraweak chemiluminescence arising from lipoperoxidation has been attributed by several authors to the radiative deactivation of singlet oxygen and triplet carbonyl products. The latter emitters have been suggested to come from annihilation of RO . and ROO . radicals as well as from the thermolysis of dioxetane intermediates formed by (2+2) cycloaddition of 1O 2 to polyunsaturated fatty acids. This article questions possible dioxetane intermediacy in lipoperoxidation, as the literature clearly states that addition of 1O 2 to alpha-hydrogen-containing alphatic olefins yields only the corresponding allylic hydroperoxides. These compounds may undergo dark thermal or Lewis acid-assisted decomposition to the same product obtained from dioxetane cleavage. Here, reexamining the chemiluminescence properties of dioxygenabted tetramethylethylene and linoleic acid and comparing them with those of tetraethyldioxetane, a hindered dioxetane, we corroborate the literature information that only steric hindrance leads to dioxetane formation upon singlet oxygen addition to electron-poor olefins, albeit in very low yields. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1H-NMR) analysis, quenching by dioxygen and energy transfer studies to 9,10-dibro-monanthracene, as well as gas chromatography (GC) analysis of thriphenylphosphine-treated and untreated photo- and chemically dioxygenated olefins support our final conclusion that dioxetane formation during lipoporoxidation can be safely exluded on the basis of the data presently available.