Abstract
The author criticizes the position of A. Ausan and V. Tambovtsev presented in their recent paper (VE, 2005, No 5). He argues that the idea of construction of civil society by governmental structures is not the right one because that position presumes the rationality of civil society. He offers more fruitful approaches to analyzing civil society based on socioeconomics and "old" institutionalism. The author concludes that civil society will be vital only if it provides the alternative to "power vertical" and market ethics expansion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
