Are behavioural traits in prey sensitive to the risk imposed by predatory fish?

Abstract

Summary1. Behavioural differences among prey species may result from evolutionary adaptations that facilitate coexistence with different predators and influence vulnerability to predators. It has been hypothesised that prey species modify their behaviour in relation to the risk posed by particular predators.2. We examined the relationship between anti‐predator behaviour and predation risk in five species of larval odonates in combination with three predatory fish species (perch, gudgeon and rudd) that differ in foraging behaviour. The odonates,Platycnemis pennipes,Coenagrion puella,Lestes sponsa,Sympetrum striolatumandLibellula depressa, differ with regard to their life cycle and habitat, including water depth, occurrence in temporary ponds and co‐existence with fish.3. The odonate species differed in their response to fish: (i) Two species showed a flexible response. LarvalC. puellareduced activity in the presence of fish, regardless of species, whereasL. depressaaltered their activity only in the presence of gudgeon. (ii) Independent of fish species, all odonates exceptL. depressaexhibited spatial avoidance of fish. This was interpreted as a more general anti‐predator response. (iii) In some cases the odonates showed no response to predators and their behaviour was thus independent of predation risk.4. Our results confirm that all odonates responded to the presence of at least some predatory fish, and that some odonate species discriminated between fish species. However, we found no significant correlation between behavioural modifications and predation risk, indicating that anti‐predator responses and predation risk depend on the particular predator and the species being preyed on.