Abstract
<span>In recent years many firms adopted antitakeover amendments to their corporate charters. The amendments have come under criticism from those who believe that they are harmful, and little sentiment in favor of the amendments seems to exist. This article discusses issues related to antitakeover amendments, and presents an overview of available empirical evidence about the amendments. The evidence demonstrates that the amendments are not always harmful and indeed suggests that the amendments, at least in some cases, are beneficial.</span>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
