Abstract
Are business cycles always costly? This paper sheds new light on this question in the context of a two-sector neoclassical business cycle model by focusing on the roles of the origin of shocks and the degree of real frictions that restrict factor reallocation both inter-temporally (investment adjustment cost) and intra-temporally (inter-sectoral factor immobilities). We find that under the benchmark parameterization, investment-specific technology shocks are welfare-improving while consumption-specific technology shocks are welfare-detrimental, regardless of the degree of real frictions. While aggregate TFP shocks can be both depending on the degree of real frictions, welfare-improving business cycles are not supported by empirical evidence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
