Abstract
This paper investigates whether members of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), as is often assumed, behave in accordance with legalistic models of judge behavior. So far, different from courts in the U.S. And elsewhere, there is no conclusive evidence that the background of individual judges influence the decision-making of the Court. There are two possible explanations for this. First, it seems possible that the unique institutional culture at the Court has created an environment which minimizes the influence of such factors. Second, it seems possible that these effects exist, but that they have so far gone largely unnoticed, because the non-disclosure of individual votes and non-random case assignment pose great challenges to any attempt to identify them. This paper focuses on the impact of the political preferences of Member State governments on the decision-making of the Advocates General, who are judge-like members of the ECJ. I develop a formal test to answer whether a relationship exists between the policy preferences of EU Member State governments with regard to European integration, and the decision behavior of Advocates General appointed by these governments. This test formalizes the intuition that, if one Advocate General shows a high probability of deviating from a certain chamber in an integration-friendly direction, while another Advocate General shows a high probability of deviating in an integration-critical direction from decisions by the same chamber, one can infer that the decision standard applied by the first Advocate General is more integration-friendly than that of the second Advocate General. I find that Advocates General appointed by governments with prointegration preferences are on average more likely to deviate from the Court in a pro-integration direction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.