Abstract
<p>The uptake of anthropogenic carbon (C<sub>ant</sub>) by the ocean leads to ocean acidification, causing the reduction of pH and the calcium carbonate saturation states of aragonite (Ω<sub>arag</sub>) and calcite (Ω<sub>calc</sub>). The Arctic Ocean is particularly vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its naturally low pH and saturation states and due to ongoing freshening and the concurrent reduction in alkalinity in this region. Here, we present projections of  C<sub>ant</sub> and ocean acidification in the Arctic Ocean over the 21<sup>st</sup> century across Earth System Models (ESMs) from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Compared to the previous model generation (CMIP5), the inter-model uncertainty of projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean Ω<sub>arag/calc</sub> is reduced by 44–64 %. The strong reduction in projection uncertainties of Ω<sub>arag/calc</sub> can be attributed to compensation between C<sub>ant</sub> uptake and alkalinity reduction in the latest models. Specifically, ESMs with a large increase in Arctic Ocean C<sub>ant</sub> over the 21<sup>st</sup> century tend to simulate a relatively weak concurrent freshening and alkalinity reduction, while ESMs with a small increase in C<sub>ant</sub> simulate a relatively strong freshening and concurrent alkalinity reduction. Although both mechanisms contribute to Arctic Ocean acidification over the 21<sup>st</sup> century, the increase in C<sub>ant</sub> remains the dominant driver. Even under the low-emissions shared socioeconomic pathway SSP1-2.6, basin-wide averaged aragonite undersaturation occurs before the end of the century. While under the high-emissions pathway SSP5-8.5, the Arctic Ocean mesopelagic is projected to even become undersaturated with respect to calcite. An emergent constraint, identified in CMIP5, which relates present-day maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean to the projected end-of-century Arctic Ocean C<sub>ant</sub> inventory, is found to generally hold in CMIP6. However, a coincident constraint on Arctic declines in Ω<sub>arag/calc</sub> is not apparent in the new generation of models. This is due to both the reduction in Ω<sub>arag/calc</sub> projection uncertainty and the weaker direct relationship between projected changes in Arctic Ocean C<sub>ant</sub> and Ω<sub>arag/calc</sub>. In CMIP6, models generally better simulate maximum sea surface densities in the Arctic Ocean and consequently the transport of C<sub>ant</sub> into the Arctic Ocean interior, with simulated historical increases in C<sub>ant</sub> in improved agreement with observational products.</p>
Highlights
Over the 21st century the Arctic Ocean Cant inventory increases depending on the SSP
Across the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) model ensemble, the Arctic Ocean Cant storage over the 21st century is highly related to maximum sea surface densities (Fig. 2), which predominately occur in the Barents Sea (Midttun, 1985; Smedsrud et al, 2013; Terhaar et al, 2020a)
The inter-model range in maximum sea surface density in the Barents Sea is mainly explained by differences in sea surface salinities (r2 = 0.93), which are influenced by brine rejection (Midttun, 1985; Årthun et al, 2011) and the strength of inflowing, saltier Atlantic waters through the Barents Sea Opening (Fig. 7)
Summary
Human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, cement production, and land use change have released large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere that cause global warming. The ocean mitigates global warming by taking up around one-quarter of this anthropogenic carbon (Cant) (Friedlingstein et al, 2019). The increase of carbon in the ocean causes ocean acidification, a process that decreases pH, carbonate ion (CO23−) concentrations, and in conse-. J. Terhaar et al.: Future Arctic Ocean acidification in CMIP6 models quence the calcium carbonate (CaCO3) saturation states of calcite and aragonite minerals (Haugan and Drange, 1996; Orr et al, 2005). The Arctic Ocean is vulnerable to ocean acidification due to its naturally high dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations, its low carbonate ion concentrations, and its naturally low saturation states (Orr et al, 2005; Fabry et al, 2009; Gattuso and Hansson, 2011; Riebesell et al, 2013; AMAP, 2018)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.