Abstract

An inherent problem with simultaneous 5-axis machining is that it often suffers from dramatic reductions in feed rate when the tool axis is in the vicinity of the singularity point of the machine; during large orientation changes over small distances; during rotary axes reversals and from interpolation of the tool axis vector. 3 1 2 1 2 -axis machining offers an alternative strategy that can be used to overcome these problems and still maintain some of the salient features of 5-axis machining to improve machining times over 3-axis ballnose machining. In 3 1 2 1 2 -axis machining, during cutting the machine moves only its three linear axes while the two rotary axes are locked, resulting in a fixed tool orientation. Locking the rotary axes generates fewer fluctuations in the feed rate than simultaneous 5-axis machining and results in a more consistent surface finish with lower variations in cutting force and torque. A new tool positioning strategy called the Arc-Intersect Method (AIM), which can also be applied to simultaneous 5-axis machining, is presented here for 3 1 2 1 2 -axis machining on simultaneous 5-axis machines using toroidal or flat endmills. A cutting test was performed and the part was measured with a CMM to check for accuracy and to measure the cusp heights. Machining times were compared to 5- and 3-axis tool paths and cutting torque measurements were compared between 3 1 2 1 2 - and 5-axis machining.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.