Abstract

In November 2004, the University of Cambridge announced its intention to close the Architecture Department,1 following a drop from a 5 to a 4 in the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), which aimed to measure the quality of research activity across the Higher Education sector in the UK.2 Other departments in the University of Cambridge achieved a 5 or a 5* rating in the same exercise. In 2004 the University’s General Board, which oversees academic standards within the University, came to the conclusion that the Department of Architecture was making ‘insufficient progress towards meeting Cambridge standards in terms of research quality’ and advised that it should be shut down.3 While this remained a recommendation, with no official action having yet been made, the threat of closure sparked an outrage both within and outside Cambridge. After a campaign in the national press, the architecture department was saved [1, 2].

Highlights

  • There are two key figures who played a significant role in shaping the place of research in architecture

  • Campbell In November 2004, the University of Cambridge announced its intention to close the Architecture Department,[1] following a drop from a 5 to a 4 in the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), which aimed to measure the quality of research activity across the Higher Education sector in the UK.[2]

  • In Cambridge the response was led by Sir Leslie Martin, who chaired the 1958 RIBA Conference on Architectural Education in Oxford and remained an important figure in the development of architectural education throughout the 1960s

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are two key figures who played a significant role in shaping the place of research in architecture.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call