Abstract
It is widely believed that good designers are the best judges of architectural design. In the present study 27 architecture students rated 15 architectural designs by other students. The instructors' ratings were criteria. As predicted, good student designers were not more accurate than poor student designers, and they erred in opposite directions; average students were most accurate. Contrary to expectation, poor designs were, on the average, most accurately rated, but they also provided the greatest disagreement. A post hoc factor analysis of the data is discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
