Abstract

PurposePrivate equity and venture capital (VC) firms in the capital markets sector invest capital with the primary goal of delivering economic value. However, some firms in the capital markets sector have started to shift this focus to create (i.e. invest in) social value. More specifically, traditional VC firms are starting socially oriented funds, while other firms have emerged to focus solely on investments in social enterprises. These VC firms are contributing to an interesting paradox – performance metrics are not measured by profit alone but also by social innovation. From an architectural perspective, the authors examine the implications of internal design, i.e. how specific strategic and structural factors influence the financial performance of VC firms with a social orientation to determine if these firms really can “do well and do good.”Design/methodology/approachSocial orientation was determined by content analysis of mission statements of the VC firms. Firm strategies, structures and performance were sourced from secondary data. A moderated mediation model was used to test relationships.FindingsResults suggest that (1) socially responsible VC firms adopt distinct foci of social investing that directs their strategic orientation and (2) these various foci have vastly differing effects on the firm's overall performance, strategic decisions made and the architecture of their structural design.Originality/valueThis study is among the first to explore socially responsible VC architectural dimensions, with implications for firm design based on blended measures of success.

Highlights

  • Responsible investing (SRI) is a fast-growing segment of the financial service industry involving over $17.1 trillion in professionally managed assets in the USA alone (Social Investment Forum, 2020)

  • Results of the bivariate (Pearson) correlations were somewhat mixed for the relationships between the multiple dimensions of social mission and the primary dependent variable, venture capital (VC) firm performance (Table 2)

  • While five of the six dimensions of social mission were significantly related to firm performance, only the social and governance dimensions were positive

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Responsible investing (SRI) is a fast-growing segment of the financial service industry involving over $17.1 trillion in professionally managed assets in the USA alone (Social Investment Forum, 2020). SRI is as a process of integrating personal values and societal concerns into investment decision-making and impactful type of social innovation (Schueth, 2003). SRI embodying ethical values, environmental protection, improved social conditions and good governance has attracted the interest of individual and private investors, as well as academics (Revelli and Viviani, 2015). Not unlike conventional types of investments, SRI applies a set of investment screens to select or exclude assets (Renneboog et al, 2008). Notwithstanding the economics of this approach, the social values embodied in. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons. org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call