Abstract

Mapping is a key research tool to understand the relationship between specific geographical features and territorial transformations (settlement patterns, hydraulic works, new rail and road infrastructure, land-use change). Starting from the Italian academic tradition (Muratori, Caniggia, Rossi) that focused mainly on the urban context we have developed mapping for fringe-areas at various scales: from city and countryside to expanding rural areas that mark the shifting boundaries(using the agricultural Behera-Region/Alexandria in Egypt and the Belgrade urban evolution in Serbia). Mapping should envision not only the geomorphological features but also the complexity of the landscape structure, as a repository of layers, questioning what are we looking for through mapping and constructing the legend accordingly: selecting which elements need to be highlighted or remain latent and which additional elements need to be identified with the help of complementary sources. GIS holds potential for showing key physical features, their extent, quantity and position in a single glance but is mapping the same as tracing? Is it capable of showing the space-time whirl in landscape transformations?

Highlights

  • [for architects, urban designers and landscape architects] mapping refers to more than inventory and geometrical measure, and no presumption is made of innocence, neutrality or inertia in its construction

  • The map is first employed as a means of ‘finding’ and ‘founding’ new projects, effectively re-working what already exists

  • In pointing out the difference between “finding” and “founding”, Cosgrove helps us introducing architects’ maps, most often transcending analytical descriptions of the status quo to reveal the potential for future change

Read more

Summary

Introduction

According to James Corner,[for architects, urban designers and landscape architects] mapping refers to more than inventory and geometrical measure, and no presumption is made of innocence, neutrality or inertia in its construction. To clarify how conjectural mapping may become a tool to depict the historical depth of a given territory, we shall present two paradigmatic case studies: Alexandria at the edge of the Nile Delta [3] and Belgrade at the confluence of the Sava and the Danube [43, 6].

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call