Abstract

Overflow metabolism in the presence of oxygen occurs at fast growth rates in a wide range of organisms including bacteria, yeast and cancer cells and plays an important role in biotechnology during production of proteins or metabolic compounds. As recently suggested, overflow metabolism can be understood in terms of proteome allocation, since fermentation has lower proteome cost for energy production than respiration. Here, we demonstrate that ArcA overexpression in aerobic conditions, results in downregulation of respiratory pathways and enhanced growth rates on glycolytic substrates of E. coli, coinciding with acetate excretion and increased carbon uptake rates. These results suggest that fermentation enables faster growth and demonstrate that fermentation on many glycolytic carbon sources is not limited by carbon uptake. Hence, these findings are difficult to reconcile with many alternative hypotheses that have been proposed for the origin of overflow metabolism and the growth rate dependence of fermentation and respiration, which are based on limited capacity of respiration or limitations in uptake rates and catabolic pathways. Instead, as suggested by increased lag phases of ArcA overexpression strains, respiratory energy metabolism may be related to a general preparatory response, observed for decreasing growth rates, but with limited advantages for maximizing steady-state growth rate.

Highlights

  • Respiration and fermentation are alternative metabolic strategies for energy production

  • In previous work[3], we demonstrated that the patterns of acetate excretion in E. coli under different growth limitations can be explained by a proteome allocation model

  • We demonstrate that forcing E. coli K12 strains to increase fermentation of glycolytic carbon sources results in enhanced growth rates, lower biomass yield and higher carbon uptake rates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Respiration and fermentation are alternative metabolic strategies for energy production. Important questions regarding the underlying rationale of these patterns remain, in particular, the reason for the heavy reliance on respiration observed for many glycolytic carbon sources[3,9], when fermentation should be advantageous for fast growth. It is unclear why E. coli strains grow slowly on many glycolytic substrates, and use respiration exclusively to meet their energy needs, even when the carbon source is highly abundant in the medium. Coli strains not learned to express higher levels of carbon transporters on these substrates, or are there fundamental limitations to carbon uptake rates? Or do these slow growth rates arise from as yet unappreciated objectives other than growth rate maximization?

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.