Abstract
ABSTRACT Guided discretion sentencing and proportionality review are methods used by death penalty jurisdictions to control for arbitrariness and discrimination in sentencing. From trial judge reports of capital cases collected by the Missouri Supreme Court, this paper uses the three dimensional classification system developed by Barnett to assess the adequacy of the Missouri Supreme Court's death penalty review. The findings show that very few death penalty cases are presumptively proportionate. By pooling cases of similar levels of culpability using the Barnett Scale, we conclude that at least eight of the 107 death sentences are presumed to be comparatively excessive, and a much larger number are suspect. Using logistic regression procedures, evidence was found of discrimination based on the race of the victim in the prosecutorial decision to proceed to penalty trial and in sentencing. Evidence from the Supplemental Homicide Reports also suggest racial disparities based on the race of victim and offend...
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
