Abstract

In this article, we discuss the way offshore financial centres are used by the multi-subsidiary, multi-jurisdictional group structure known as the ‘multinational enterprise’ to arbitrage between social geographies of political jurisdictions. We define arbitrage as the use of corporate legal entities located in diverse jurisdictions to arbitrate a third country's rules and regulations. Using a new method to categorize firm-level data from Van Dijk’s Orbis, we operationalize the notion of arbitrage to systematically detail and compare the structural sequencing choices firms are making, likely in part for reasons of arbitrage. We base our techniques on legal theory of the firm, acknowledging the underpinning of social technologies of law and accounting by which business enterprises are constructed and maintained. We conclude that two specific types of entities, ‘standalones’ versus ‘in-betweeners’, are qualitatively different from others in the activities they perform. We also highlight the existence of liability structures, or ‘fuses’, which typically take the form of a split ownership arrangement. Ultimately, we demonstrate that the position of a firm’s subsidiary within the overall network ecology of that firm is as important as its jurisdictional registration location.

Highlights

  • multinational enterprises (MNEs) supplement their investment in productive and administrative capabilities with commensurate structures designed to mitigate a range of risks, including political and regulatory liabilities and costs, such as taxation

  • Whereas the choices of location of strategically relevant productive activities by MNEs have been studied at great length, decisions on the spatial configuration and layering of control of corporate groups remain less understood

  • We focus on the way MNEs employ one subset of subsidiaries, those located in offshore financial centres (OFCs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The international blocker had to be placed on a corporate chain and in a jurisdiction in such way that it could arbitrage the rules of taxation or governance of the parent and the rules, regulations and taxes of the country of registration of that entity.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.