Aqueous Partitioning of Minor Actinides by Different Processes

Abstract

Actinide partitioning is a proposed strategy for effective mitigation of the long-term hazards associated with high-level waste (HLW). Octyl-(phenyl)–N,N-diisobutyl carbamoyl methyl phosphine oxide (CMPO) and diphenyl–N,N-diisobutyl carbamoyl methyl phosphine oxide (DφCMPO) are amongst the promising extractants extensively studied since the 1980s for actinide partitioning from wastes of different origin. During the last two decades, substituted malonamide extractants such as N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-dibutyl tetradecyl malonamide (DMDBTDMA) and N,N'-dimethyl-N,N'-dioctyl hexylethoxy malonamide (DMDOHEMA) have emerged as viable green alternatives to phosphine oxides. During the last decade, diglycolamide-based extractants such as N,N,N′,N′-tetraoctyl diglycolamide (TODGA) and N,N,N′,N′-tetra-2-ethylhexyl diglycolamide (TEHDGA) have received considerable attention due to overwhelmingly favourable extraction and stripping efficiencies of minor actinides from different types of transuranium (TRU) wastes. The focus of the present review is to carry out comparative evaluation of the key physical and chemical properties of these extractants for hydrometallurgical applications. Merits of flow sheets proposed for the separation and recovery of minor actinides from high-level wastes have also been discussed.