Abstract

Freshwater fungi are a diverse group of organisms and fulfil important functions in the food web dynamics of surface water ecosystems. Ascomycetic and basidiomycetic hyphomycetes play key roles in leaf litter breakdown in rivers and creeks, while parasitic chytrids are an important food source for small invertebrates in lakes. Field studies indicate that fungal communities are affected by fungicides at environmentally relevant concentrations. However, despite their ecological importance, freshwater fungi are currently not specifically addressed in the EU regulatory frameworks with respect to the protection of surface waters. Specifically, the prospective risk assessment of fungicides does not evaluate adverse effects on non-target aquatic fungi. This paper aims to describe important functions of freshwater fungi, provides an overview of adverse effect levels of fungicides on this organism group, and proposes to integrate the fungal community of freshwater ecosystems as an additional trophic level in the current fungicide risk assessment frameworks. Results of a literature review on the effects of fungicides on aquatic fungi revealed that information on the toxicity of fungicides to non-target aquatic fungi is limited. This is, in part, due to the lack of standardised bioassays using aquatic fungi as test species. Although there is an encouraging number of bioassays focusing on the degradation of dead organic material by hyphomycetes, studies on fungicide effects on other important ecological functions, like the control of algal blooms in lentic surface waters by parasitic chytrid fungi, or on mutualistic fungi living in the guts of aquatic arthropods are largely missing. Thus, the further development and standardisation of different fungi bioassays is recommended.

Highlights

  • One of the most important anthropogenic hazards for the ecological health of freshwater ecosystems is the input of pesticides via point sources such as wastewater treatment plants as well as non-point sources, such as spray drift, drainage and run-off from agricultural fields (e.g., Petersen et al, 2013; Moschet et al, 2014)

  • This paper provides an overview on the current classification and ecology of fungi in freshwater ecosystems, addresses fungicide exposure in surface waters, and reviews current information on the effects of organic fungicides on freshwater fungi

  • Freshwater ecosystems comprise complex food webs in which each species plays an essential role as primary producer consumer (e.g., Daphnia, fish) or decomposer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most important anthropogenic hazards for the ecological health of freshwater ecosystems is the input of pesticides (biocides and plant production products) via point sources such as wastewater treatment plants (mainly biocides) as well as non-point sources, such as spray drift, drainage and run-off from agricultural fields (e.g., Petersen et al, 2013; Moschet et al, 2014). To protect the ecology of water bodies from adverse effects of plant protection products (PPP), a prospective risk assessment is conducted by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) prior to authorization of active ingredients and their formulated products. The EFSA guidance document (EFSA, 2013), requires toxicity data for three taxonomic groups: plants (e.g., algae, duckweed), Aquatic Fungi in Risk Assessment invertebrates (e.g., cladoceran crustacea e.g., Daphnia magna) and a fish species, representing a simplified food chain consisting of primary producers, primary consumers, and secondary consumers. The most recent version of the EFSA guidance document (EFSA, 2013) acknowledges that studies by Maltby et al (2009); Bundschuh et al (2011); Dijksterhuis et al (2011), and Zubrod et al (2015a) give reason for concern that the current data requirements for ecological risk assessment does not adequately consider the risk of fungicides for aquatic fungi. Recent studies suggest that aquatic fungi are sensitive to ergosterol-inhibiting fungicides such as triazoles [Dijksterhuis et al (2011), Dimitrov et al (2014), Zubrod et al (2015b) and references therein]

Objectives
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call