Abstract
To describe claims brought to Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico (Medical Arbitration National Commission or Conamed) against medical care services in Mexico City. Also, to identify deficiencies in the quality of care by institution and medical speciality and describe some characteristics of the plaintiffs. A total of 1925 claims were collected and data were analysed quantitatively. Pearson's chi-square (c2) test and a cluster analysis were performed. Most claims are related to therapy, surgery, and diagnosis problems. Claims related to structure, process, and outcomes were also identified for each defendant institution. Claims vary by sex, age, and socio-economic levels. Claims brought to Co-named are useful indicators of users' dissatisfaction. Our results are consistent with other papers about users' satisfaction and quality of health care.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
