Abstract
There is a small error in the proof of Lemma 1 [1], namely, that there may not be a subsequence of the sequence {Φn} converging to Φ in the weak*-topology. Thus equation (5) should read: In view of continuity of Pk we haveThe same error occurs in the proof of Theorem 1 and Lemma 2 also. Therefore, equation (7) should readand this leads to lim . Similarly, equation (8) should readwhich implies that Ψn (x) → ‖x‖. Then there is no need of taking a subsequence.All the same the results are not affected by the above error.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
