Abstract

AbstractTruncating the Fourier transform averaged by means of a generalized Hausdorff operator, we approximate functions and the adjoint to that Hausdorff operator of the given function. We find estimates for the rate of approximation in various metrics in terms of the parameter of truncation and the components of the Hausdorff operator. Explicit rates of approximation of functions and comparison with approximate identities are given in the case of continuous functions from the class $\text {Lip }\alpha $ .

Highlights

  • Introduction e classicalHausdorff operator is defined, by means of a kernel φ, as (.) (Hφ f )(x) =φ(t) f Rt x t dt, and, as is shown first in [ ], such an operator is bounded in L (R) whenever φ ∈ L (R).In the last two decades, various problems related to Hausdorff operators have attracted a lot of attention. e number of publications is growing considerably; to add some of the most notable, we mention [, ]. ere are two survey papers: [ ] and [ ]

  • Πf (y)eix y d y does not hold for f ∈ L (R); in order to “repair” this, one can consider some transformation of the function f or of its Fourier transform

  • We will always assume that f ∈ L (R), so thatf is well defined, andf ∈ L∞(R)

Read more

Summary

Main Results

Let us discuss some boundedness properties of the Hausdorff operator in Lebesgue spaces, in order for H∗( f ) (and the Hausdorff operator in ( . )) to be well defined. We will always assume that f ∈ L (R), so thatf is well defined, andf ∈ L∞(R). A sufficient condition for the operator H∗ to be bounded on Lp(R) is ( .). A sufficient condition (and necessary whenever φ ≥ a.e.) for the Hausdorff operator to be bounded on Lp(R) is that φ(t) a(t) p′ dt < ∞,. For further results on boundedness (and Pitt-type inequalities) of Hausdorff operators, we refer the reader to [ ]. Our main results concerning approximation of adjoint Hausdorff operators read as follows. E fact that the adjoint Hausdorff operator of a function is approximated may be unsatisfactory in principle, as one would rather approximate the function itself. Approximating a function instead of its adjoint Hausdorff operator is possible as a consequence of the following observation.

Proofs
Examples
Comparison
Approximation via the Riemann–Liouville Integral
Final Remarks
Approximation of Non-adjoint Hausdorff Operators
A Hausdorff Operator with Slowly Decaying φ: the Bellman Operator

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.